Why More Leads Won't Fix Your Revenue Problem (And What Actually Will)
Chloe and Derek Buntin talk on the trap of chasing more leads instead of qualifying the right ones, and why 95% of your future buyers aren't in the market today.
You've generated more leads. You've got a full pipeline. Revenue's still flat - and your sales team is drowning in tyre-kickers who were never going to buy. This is what happens when businesses chase volume instead of qualification. You end up busy and broke at the same time.
Why This Keeps Happening
Because "more leads" is the easiest number to grow yet the least useful.
The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute's research, published by LinkedIn's B2B Institute, shows that only 5% of B2B buyers are in-market at any given time. The other 95% aren't shopping for what you sell - even if you fill a database with a thousand of them and hand them to your sales team. Most sales activity in most B2B businesses is spent on the 95%. That's why the pipeline looks full and the revenue stays flat. Ten leads who are genuinely in-market convert more than a thousand who aren't. The number to grow isn't leads. It's the fit between leads and buyer readiness.
What Chloe And Derek Cover In This Episode
In this episode, Chloe and Derek Buntin break down the specific mistakes that turn lead gen into revenue leaks, why sales teams are being incentivised on the wrong metrics, why cold pitching without research is quietly damaging your brand, and what real account-based marketing actually looks like versus what most agencies sell as ABM. They also cover what to build instead - a single sovereign revenue system that unifies marketing, sales, customer success, and operations into one motion, so the leads that do come in actually convert.
In This Episode, You'll Learn:
- Why "we need more leads" is almost always the wrong response to flat revenue
- The 95/5 rule of B2B buying, and what it means for every marketing dollar you're about to spend
- How incentivising the wrong sales metrics quietly kills conversion
- What real account-based marketing actually looks like (and what most agencies sell as ABM instead)
- The system underneath every high-converting B2B business, and why it's not another lead-gen tool
You Ask, We Answer
Frequently Asked Questions
The fix isn't more leads. It's better qualification of the ones you already have.
Marketing to the 95% builds the mental availability that determines who they choose when they enter the market.
Account-based marketing goes narrow - identify specific companies you want as clients, research them deeply, build sustained relationships with multiple stakeholders inside each one. Real ABM is a multi-month, multi-touchpoint strategy - not a cold email plus a LinkedIn connection request.
Most under-performing marketing budgets fail because the brand doesn't know exactly who it's trying to reach - so the messaging tries to appeal to everyone and lands with no one.
A precise ICP, defined buyer personas, and one aligned message will outperform a bigger budget with generic targeting almost every time.
Instead of stitching together disconnected tools or hiring separate agencies for each function, clients get one platform that identifies where growth is actually leaking and rebuilds the infrastructure underneath so the same problem doesn't return.